plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #1
TL;DR: Is this reduction in peak power a result of my panels getting hotter? I didn't check voltages, so don't know if there was clipping going on at the inverter level. We have another glorious day today, hotter than yesterday, and my production curve is already just-slightly-lower than the day before.
Yesterday was a beautiful day. Perfect weather. I think it hit 80 degrees ambient. I looked at my production, and noticed the peak was... flat. That horizontal line is 2 kW.
The day before was cloudy in the morning. The clouds prevented good production, but it would routinely go higher than the day before, and the peak wasn't flat. When the clouds finally parted, it was glorious production until my batteries filled.
sunshine_eggo
Happy Breffast!
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2021
- Messages
- 16,303
- Location
- HBR, USA (6500' in ENE AZ)
- May 10, 2024
- #2
Probably.
PV peak performance is often lower in summer than it is in spring/fall due to the higher cell temps, BUT you get more total kWh/day because of longer solar exposure.
Check your cell temps. They're probably in the 40-50°C range, which will typically shave about 8% off your peak.
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #3
Measuring as simple as using a handheld device like this?
sunshine_eggo
Happy Breffast!
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2021
- Messages
- 16,303
- Location
- HBR, USA (6500' in ENE AZ)
- May 10, 2024
- #4
plympton said:
Measuring as simple as using a handheld device like this?
View attachment 214483
Yep. I wouldn't trust a long range reading... want to be up close and personal. Check backside too
G
glandpuck
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2023
- Messages
- 472
- Location
- San Diego
- May 10, 2024
- #5
During this time of the year, from like 11 AM until about 1:30 PM the angle of the sun on the panels is near optimal and so you are not going to get a sharp peak or spike, more of that continuous flatter power output you are showing. That's fine.
In direct sun at ambient 80 degrees, I suspect your panel surface will reach about 135-140 degrees. I have had mine measure about 145-150 in San Diego in direct sun on 100 degree days.
V
v_green57
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2022
- Messages
- 324
- May 10, 2024
- #6
If you don't want to spend the $$$ on the IR thermometer (although it's a nice tool to have for other stuff), put a big load on your system (so the array is at max. output) and cool the panels with some water at some point near solar noon. They are rated for this (rain).
Watch your PV output before and after.
You will be surprised and a little dismayed at the loss of output due to high temps. It was a "holy s**t! moment for me when I did it many years ago when I was just starting out.
hwy17
Anti-Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2022
- Messages
- 3,101
- Location
- Santa Cruz, California
- May 10, 2024
- #7
Bird landed on panel?
It's a very small dip.
Oh! Maybe MPPT entered periodic search mode restart, spent some time exploring worse power points.
Finally, even on a "blue sky" there are differences in atmospheric moisture content that I don't think we can really differentiate with our eyes. So maybe just slightly worse illumination.
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #8
hwy17 said:
Bird landed on panel?
It's a very small dip.
Oh! Maybe MPPT entered periodic search mode restart, spent some time exploring worse power points.
Finally, even on a "blue sky" there are differences in atmospheric moisture content that I don't think we can really differentiate with our eyes. So maybe just slightly worse illumination.
Small, but noticeable. All this solar stuff is mostly a hands-on exploration to learn the nuance of it all - so pouring over the data is really interesting to me. Seeing the effect of shade, heat, etc. I'll start tracking temp vs. output on these really nice days and see what the difference is. Makes me wish I kept my "spare" panels!
hwy17
Anti-Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2022
- Messages
- 3,101
- Location
- Santa Cruz, California
- May 10, 2024
- #9
plympton said:
Small, but noticeable. All this solar stuff is mostly a hands-on exploration to learn the nuance of it all - so pouring over the data is really interesting to me. Seeing the effect of shade, heat, etc. I'll start tracking temp vs. output on these really nice days and see what the difference is. Makes me wish I kept my "spare" panels!
Do you have a weather station yet? I use an Ambient Weather one that has solar irradiance readings. Tracking that separately would surely provide more interesting graphs to look at.
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #10
v_green57 said:
If you don't want to spend the $$$ on the IR thermometer (although it's a nice tool to have for other stuff), put a big load on your system (so the array is at max. output) and cool the panels with some water at some point near solar noon. They are rated for this (rain).
Watch your PV output before and after.
You will be surprised and a little dismayed at the loss of output due to high temps. It was a "holy s**t! moment for me when I did it many years ago when I was just starting out.
They're awesome devices. And great cat toys. I was curious if anyone employed active cooling, but of course, it's been discussed. I was thinking a thermostatic valve attached to line pressure water and a simple mister, but sounds like more hassle than it's worth.
Wasn't prepared for the drop in production so soon in the year. Makes me wonder what it'll be like when we hit > 100 F ambient!
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #11
hwy17 said:
Do you have a weather station yet? I use an Ambient Weather one that has solar irradiance readings. Tracking that separately would surely provide more interesting graphs to look at.
Not yet, but could be in my future. I do have an irradiance meter I can break out to get some manually collected data. Helps I can work from home on the nice days!
hwy17
Anti-Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2022
- Messages
- 3,101
- Location
- Santa Cruz, California
- May 10, 2024
- #12
plympton said:
Not yet, but could be in my future. I do have an irradiance meter I can break out to get some manually collected data. Helps I can work from home on the nice days!
Mine's the WS-2902 or very similar to it, and I'm happy with it. 3 years now still going fine. I set it up to report to wunderground so I can just check my wunderground station page for historical data and graphs. The base station wifi setup is a little finnicky but functionally works fine once set up. My outdoor is 100ft from where the living room base station lives and never has signal problems.
T
timselectric
If I can do it, you can do it.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2022
- Messages
- 19,076
- May 10, 2024
- #13
v_green57 said:
If you don't want to spend the $$$ on the IR thermometer (although it's a nice tool to have for other stuff), put a big load on your system (so the array is at max. output) and cool the panels with some water at some point near solar noon. They are rated for this (rain).
Watch your PV output before and after.
You will be surprised and a little dismayed at the loss of output due to high temps. It was a "holy s**t! moment for me when I did it many years ago when I was just starting out.
I have contemplated solar sprinklers, for this reason. (Recycled rainwater)
If and when I decide that I need more production in the summer.
M
mciholas
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2024
- Messages
- 351
- Location
- Indiana
- May 10, 2024
- #14
timselectric said:
I have contemplated solar sprinklers, for this reason. (Recycled rainwater)
If and when I decide that I need more production in the summer.
Are you worried about evaporation leaving behind deposits? That can hurt production, too.
While rain water is theoretically distilled and pure, it does pick up airborne particles and dust that washed off your roof.
Given the price of panels, a few extra seems like the cheapest solution provided you have the rack space.
Mike C.
V
v_green57
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2022
- Messages
- 324
- May 10, 2024
- #15
plympton said:
They're awesome devices. And great cat toys.
I was curious if anyone employed active cooling, but of course, it's been discussed. I was thinking a thermostatic valve attached to line pressure water and a simple mister, but sounds like more hassle than it's worth.
Wasn't prepared for the drop in production so soon in the year. Makes me wonder what it'll be like when we hit > 100 F ambient!
You will need to use distilled water or your panels will become encrusted with some nasty hard-to-remove mineral deposits fairly quickly.
edit:
Mike C. posted the same time as I did about this...
T
timselectric
If I can do it, you can do it.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2022
- Messages
- 19,076
- May 10, 2024
- #16
mciholas said:
Are you worried about evaporation leaving behind deposits?
Nope
Not any more than a typical rainy day.
I have plenty of production. This is just another option for the future, maybe.
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #17
For $hits and giggles, and being a man of science in cargo shorts, I just hoisted a ladder up to the panels and gave them a good spray. Works! Not a ton of water, just a spritz for a minute or so. Looks like it has about a 10 minute effect.
Before Spraying | After Spraying | |
Roof Temp Shingles | 172 F / 78 C | 146 F / 63 C |
Roof Temp Shade | 146 F / 63 C | 109 F / 43 C |
Panel Temp | 155 F / 68 C | 113 F / 45 C |
Went from 1892w to 2036w - a noticeable bump. What's curious to me is it appears there's a new baseline at 1953w. Maybe it sprayed away some contamination? Dunno. Neat stuff.
Last edited:
B
Bop
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2024
- Messages
- 356
- Location
- Australia
- May 10, 2024
- #18
plympton said:
They're awesome devices. And great cat toys.
I was curious if anyone employed active cooling, but of course, it's been discussed. I was thinking a thermostatic valve attached to line pressure water and a simple mister, but sounds like more hassle than it's worth.
Wasn't prepared for the drop in production so soon in the year. Makes me wonder what it'll be like when we hit > 100 F ambient!
Actually, those who have been in the solar game for a while are all too aware of the 'hot panel' dropoff, it is something that has to be factored into the offgrid calculations where I live (N/E Australia) where summer temps in excess of 40C or 100F are common for much of the summer months (just when demand is highest)
My 'peak' times are spring and autumn, with summer and winter pretty close to being the same...
By the time summer rocks around my panels (which have a listed -0.4% drop in power per degree Celsius rise) have dropped to under 200W from their STC ratings of 250W!!!
So basically most of the summer, I have lost about 1/5th of my arrays output...- just when I want to run the A/C...
I have actually measured my panels temps in summer at over 80C/176F, and thats a LOT of -0.4%'s adding up, with the panel being 55C above the STC specs...
So much for all the non solar 'why don't they fill the Sahara desert with solar panels and make tons of electricity' questions so commonly heard....
Literally the last place on earth to actually put them lol (thermal solar yes, PV- definitely not...)
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #19
Bop said:
My 'peak' times are spring and autumn, with summer and winter pretty close to being the same...
By the time summer rocks around my panels (which have a listed -0.4% drop in power per degree Celsius rise) have dropped to under 200W from their STC ratings of 250W!!!
So basically most of the summer, I have lost about 1/5th of my arrays output...- just when I want to run the A/C...
I have actually measured my panels temps in summer at over 80C/176F, and thats a LOT of -0.4%'s adding up, with the panel being 55C above the STC specs...
Well, running the calcs it totally makes sense now.
Power Loss=(−0.36%/°C)×((68°C)−(25°C))×(400 Watts) = -62 w/panel loss
-62*6 (panels) = 371 w loss. Nameplate: 2400w, corrected to be about 2048w.
I love me some ChatGPT. I've heard it's particularly bad at math!
Power Loss=(0.36%/°C)×((68°C)−(25°C))×(400 Watts)
Power Loss=0.0036×43×400
Power Loss=619.2 Watts
Actual Power Output=400 Watts−619.2 Watts=−219.2 Watts
So, for an ambient temperature of 68°C, the power loss due to heating would be 619.2 Watts. Therefore, the actual power output of the panel would be 400 Watts−619.2 Watts=−219.2 Watts
However, please note that a negative power loss doesn't make physical sense. It implies that the panel is generating more power than its rated power, which is not possible. In such cases, it's likely there's an error in the calculation or the given parameters.
It seems the calculations are correct. However, a negative power loss doesn't make sense physically. It's possible that the ambient temperature or other parameters might need to be adjusted.
You think!?!?
plympton
I make things and fix stuff
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2023
- Messages
- 142
- Location
- Portland
- May 10, 2024
- #20
And now I'm regretting not running water to my solar panels when I had that trench open. Oops. I wanted passive solar hot water at some point, too. Daaaaaang.
You must log in or register to reply here.